Thursday, January 14, 2016

Gene test reveals which women with breast cancer do not need chemotherapy

Research by Sparano et al published in the NEJM suggests that the gene test known as Oncotype DX may help women with early stage breast cancer avoid chemotherapy.

The authors performed a prospective trial involving women with hormone-receptor–positive, HER2–negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer with tumors of 1.1 to 5.0 cm in the greatest dimension (or 0.6 to 1.0 cm in the greatest dimension and intermediate or high tumor grade). The Oncotype DX assay of 21 genes was performed on the tumor tissue, and the results were used to calculate a score indicating the risk of breast-cancer recurrence; patients were assigned to receive endocrine therapy without chemotherapy if they had a recurrence score of 0 to 10 on a scale 1 to 100, indicating a very low risk of recurrence.

Of the 10,253 eligible women enrolled, 1626 women (15.9%) who had a recurrence score of 0 to 10 were assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone without chemotherapy. At 5 years, in this patient population, the rate of invasive disease–free survival was 93.8%, the lack of metastasis at a distant site was 99.3%, and the rate of overall survival was 98.0%.


The authors concluded that patients with hormone-receptor–positive, HER2-negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer, those with tumors that had a favorable gene-expression profile the test accurately identified the group of women whose cancers are likely to respond to hormone-blocking drugs and adding chemo would do little if any good while exposing them to side effects and other health risks.  The researchers found that patients who skipped chemo based on the test had a small chance of cancer recurrence at 5 years with endocrine therapy alone.

Friday, January 1, 2016

Top Three Posts

During the last two years I uploaded 77 posts in the blog.  The top three in order of viewing frequency were:

1.     Risk of Stroke due to Intracranial Atherosclerosis

2.     iPad is accurate in the diagnosis of bone fractures

3.     C-arm Cone-Beam CT-guided Transthoracic Needle Biopsy



Most of the visitors were from the United States, followed by Greece, Russia, France, Poland, Ukraine, Turkey, United Kingdom, Ireland and Germany in that order.

Sunday, December 13, 2015

Garden of the Generalife in Granada

In his article in the Art at JAMA Cole presents the work of Théo van Rysselberghe who was born in Ghent and studied at the city’s Royal Academy of Fine Arts.  Van Rysselberghe was a frequent visitor to Spain and North Africa, and the Mediterranean region at large. In the course of his career as an artist, he was influenced by Paul Signac, Georges Seurat, and Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec among others.  In his painting of the Garden of the Generalife in Granada, he demonstrates how visual perception changes when an observer moves from the shade into bright sunlight.  The color and symmetry of the garden draw one’s attention, but on a hot summer day, lingering in the shade is so enjoyable as all people who live in hot climates know.

The estates and gardens at Generalife were built in the 14th century and it was a favorite retreat of the Emirs of the Alhambra who stayed there when they in need of quiet time to reflect on state and personal issues. Its arcades enclosed formal gardens with fountains and reflecting pools, and the songs of birds such as nightingales were heard in its shady alcoves.

According to legend, a prince was raised in the comfort and seclusion of the Generalife to prevent him from falling in love until he reached a suitable age.  One day he rescued a dove from a hawk, and in return the dove told him of a princess in a secret garden surrounded by high walls. Soon the prince was off to find her, the implication being that a life of ease and beauty is no substitute for love.

JAMA. 2015;314(1):10-11

Courtesy of the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco (https://www.famsf.org/), San Francisco, California; gift of B. Gerald Cantor, 1969

Tuesday, December 1, 2015

No need to print mammograms on films; FDA

An FDA communiqué to mammography facilities “said that printing breast images to hard-copy film is no longer necessary and can be performed at the discretion of individual centers”. 

Over the past 20 years, there has been significant evolution in mammography, with the shift from screen-film to digital imaging being the most prominent change.


A total of 39 million procedures were performed in the 8,737 mammographic facilities that were accredited by the FDA as of Nov 1, 2015.   Today fewer than 350 screen-film units remain in use in the U.S. The nearly universal availability of computers for viewing of digital images diminishes the need for a facility to maintain a printer.


Today, with many mammograms shared on computer media such as compact discs or via online access, the provision of printed hard copies is becoming obsolete.

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Computer-Aided Detection did not improve Digital Screening Mammography's Diagnostic Accuracy

Lehman et al in a paper published by JAMAInternal Medicine report on their findings that suggest that computer-assisted detection (CAD) used in most mammograms added no benefit to breast cancer screening while it substantially increased costs.

The authors compared the accuracy of digital screening mammography interpreted with (n = 495 818) versus without (n = 129 807) CAD from 2003 through 2009 in 323 973 women.  271 radiologists in 66 facilities interpreted the mammographic studies.  They found 3159 breast cancers within 1 year of the screening.

Screening performance was not improved with CAD on any metric assessed. Mammography sensitivity was 85.3% with and 87.3% without CAD. Specificity was 91.6% with and 91.4% without CAD. There was no difference in cancer detection rate (4.1 in 1000 women screened with and without CAD). Computer-aided detection did not improve intra-radiologist performance. Sensitivity was significantly lower for mammograms interpreted with versus without CAD in the subset of radiologists who interpreted both with and without CAD.


The authors concluded CAD does not improve diagnostic accuracy of mammography. These results suggest that while insurers pay an additional $400 million a year for CAD, its addition to standard mammography had no beneficial impact to women.

Sunday, November 1, 2015

American Cancer Society Updated Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening

Breast cancer is a leading cause of premature mortality among US women.   Oeffinger at al report in JAMA the American Cancer Society (ACS) 2015 update regarding the frequency of screening mammography in women at average risk. 

The ACS recommends that women with an average risk of breast cancer should undergo annual screening mammography starting at age 45 years (strong recommendation).

Women 55 years and older should transition to biennial screening (strong recommendation).

Women should continue screening mammography as long as their overall health is good and they have a life expectancy of 10 years or longer (qualified recommendation).

Women should have the opportunity to have annual screening between at the ages of 40-45 received a qualified recommendation.

The ACS does not recommend clinical breast examination for breast cancer screening among average-risk women at any age (qualified recommendation).

These updated ACS guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for breast cancer screening for women at average risk of breast cancer.