In the article by Kong et al published at the AJR they report on the cost
effectiveness of MR-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of symptomatic
uterine fibroids. They compared this
novel treatment with more accepted therapies such as uterine artery
embolization (UAE) and hysterectomy.
In their base-case analysis, UAE as a first-line treatment of
symptomatic fibroids was the most effective and expensive strategy (22.75
QALYs; $22,968), followed by MRI-guided focused ultrasound (22.73 QALYs;
$20,252) and hysterectomy (22.54 QALYs; $11,253). MRI-guided focused ultrasound
was cost effective relative to hysterectomy, with an associated incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $47,891/QALY. The ICER of UAE relative to
MRI-guided focused ultrasound was $234,565/QALY, exceeding the WTP threshold of
$50,000/QALY, therefore rendering MRI-guided focused ultrasound also cost
effective relative to UAE.
The authors concluded that MRI-guided focused ultra-sound, an
outpatient procedure, with a cost of approximately $20,000 per treatment is a
cost-effective noninvasive therapy. For those not eligible for MRI-guided
focused ultra-sound, UAE remains a cost-effective option. Their recommendations took into account short
and long-term changes in probabilities of recurrence, symptom relief and
quality of life associated with the studied treatments.
No comments:
Post a Comment