Kuhl et al in their JCO
article report on the suitability of a fast MRI of breast cancer for screening. Their protocol consisted of one pre-contrast and one post-contrast sequences
their derived images [FAST] and maximum-intensity projection [MIP] images.
They
conducted a prospective observational study in 443 women who were at
mildly to moderately increased risk for breast cancer who underwent 606
screening MRIs. Eligible women had normal or benign digital mammograms and, for
those with heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts (n = 427), normal
or benign ultrasounds. Breast radiologists with expertise in MRI reviewed the
MIP image first to search for significant enhancement and then reviewed the
complete study that consisted of MIP and FAST images and optionally their
non-subtracted source images and characterized the enhancement in order to
establish a diagnosis. Only thereafter was the regular full diagnostic protocol
study was analyzed.
MRI
acquisition time for complete diagnostic protocol was 17 minutes, versus 3
minutes for the abbreviated protocol (AP). Average time to read the single MIP
and complete AP was 2.8 and 28 seconds, respectively. Eleven breast cancers
(four ductal carcinomas in situ and seven invasive cancers; all T1N0 intermediate
or high grade) were diagnosed, for an additional cancer yield of 18.2 per
1,000. MIP readings were positive in 10 (90.9%) of 11 cancers and allowed
establishment of the absence of breast cancer, with a negative predictive value
(NPV) of 99.8% (418 of 419). Interpretation of the study using the abbreviated
protocol, as with the full diagnostic protocol(FDP), allowed diagnosis of all
cancers (11 [100%] of 11). Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of
AP versus FDP were equivalent (94.3% v 93.9% and
24.4% v 23.4%, respectively).
The
authors conclude that the 3 minutes abbreviated protocol and a MIP image are
sufficient for an expert radiologist to establish in 3 seconds the absence of
breast cancer, with an NPV of 99.8%. With a reading time < 30 seconds for
the complete AP, diagnostic accuracy was equivalent to that of the FDP and
resulted in an additional cancer yield of 18.2 per 1,000.
No comments:
Post a Comment