Lee at al in their article in Radiology report on the effectiveness of combined biennial digital
mammography and tomosynthesis, compared with biennial digital mammography alone
to screen women aged 50-74 with dense breasts for breast cancer.
For the base-case analysis, the incremental cost
per quality-adjusted life year gained by adding tomosynthesis to digital
mammography screening was $53 893. An additional 0.5 deaths were averted and
405 false-positive findings avoided per 1000 women after 12 rounds of
screening. Combined screening remained cost-effective (less than $100 000 per
quality-adjusted life year gained) over a wide range of incremental
improvements in test performance. Overall, cost-effectiveness was most
sensitive to the additional cost of tomosynthesis.
Biennial combined digital mammography and
tomosynthesis screening for U.S. women aged 50–74 years with dense breasts is
likely to be cost-effective if priced appropriately (up to $226 for combined
examinations versus $139 for digital mammography alone) and if the reported
interpretive performance metrics of improved specificity with tomosynthesis are
met in routine practice.
They concluded biennial digital mammography
combined with tomosynthesis screening for women aged 50–74 years with dense
breasts is likely to be cost-effective if priced appropriately (up to $226 for
combined examinations versus $139 for digital mammography alone) and if specificity
reported from tomosynthesis is achieved among the many practices across the
country.
No comments:
Post a Comment