Saturday, August 1, 2015

Screening mammography has not saved lives

Harding, et al in their article published in JAMA Intern Med report on associations between screening mammography and the incidence and mortality from breast cancer, as well as tumor size.

A study of 16 million women 40 years or older who resided in 547 US counties reporting to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries during the year 2000. Of these women, 53207 were diagnosed with breast cancer that year and were followed up for the next 10 years.

Across the US counties, there was a positive correlation between the extent of screening and breast cancer incidence but not with breast cancer mortality. An absolute increase of 10 percentage points in the extent of screening was accompanied by 16% more breast cancer diagnoses but no significant change in breast cancer deaths. In an analysis stratified by tumor size, they found that more screening was strongly associated with an increased incidence of small breast cancers (≤2 cm) but not with a decreased incidence of larger breast cancers (>2 cm). An increase of 10 percentage points in screening was associated with a 25% increase in the incidence of small breast cancers and a 7% increase in the incidence of larger breast cancers.


They found that screening mammography results in the diagnosis of additional small cancers but no concomitant decline in the detection of larger cancers, which might explain the absence of any significant difference in the overall rate of death from the disease. Together, these findings suggest widespread overdiagnosis.

No comments:

Post a Comment