Showing posts with label Radiation therapy for breast cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Radiation therapy for breast cancer. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Advantages of Hypo-fractionated versus Conventional Whole-Breast Irradiation

Shaitelman et al on a paper published by JAMA Oncol report the 6-month toxic effects and quality of life (QOL) with conventionally fractionated (CF-WBI) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) vs. hypo-fractionated WBI (HF-WBI). 

Their study included 287 women 40 years or older with stage 0 to II breast cancer for whom WBI without addition of a third field was recommended.  It was conducted between February 2011 through February 2014 and the patients were observed for a minimum of 6 months. 

The study was un-blinded randomized trial of CF-WBI (n=149; 50.00 Gy/25 fractions+boost [10.00-14.00 Gy/5-7 fractions]) vs HF-WBI (n=138; 42.56 Gy/16 fractions+boost [10.00-12.50 Gy/4-5 fractions]) following breast-conserving surgery.


Of 287 participants, 149 were randomized to CF-WBI and 138 to HF-WBI. Treatment arms were well matched for baseline characteristics, including FACT-B total score (HF-WBI, 120.1 vs CF-WBI, 118.8; P=.46) and individual QOL items such as somewhat or more lack of energy (HF-WBI, 38% vs CF-WBI, 39%; P=.86) and somewhat or more trouble meeting family needs (HF-WBI, 10% vs CF-WBI, 14%; P=.54). Maximum physician-reported acute dermatitis (36% vs 69%; P<.001), pruritus (54% vs 81%; P<.001), breast pain (55% vs 74%; P=.001), hyperpigmentation (9% vs 20%; P=.002), and fatigue (9% vs 17%; P=.02) during irradiation were lower in patients randomized to HF-WBI. The rate of overall grade 2 or higher acute toxic effects was less with HF-WBI than with CF-WBI (47% vs 78%; P<.001). Six months after irradiation, physicians reported less fatigue in patients randomized to HF-WBI (0% vs 6%; P=.01), and patients randomized to HF-WBI reported less lack of energy (23% vs 39%; P<.001) and less trouble meeting family needs (3% vs 9%; P=.01). Multivariable regression confirmed the superiority of HF-WBI in terms of patient-reported lack of energy and trouble meeting family needs.

 The authors concluded that treatment with HF-WBI appears to yield lower rates of acute toxic effects than CF-WBI as well as less fatigue 6 months after completing radiation therapy.

JAMA Oncol. Published online August 06, 2015

Sunday, December 14, 2014

Incidence and Costs of Shorter Duration vs Conventional Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery

Bekelman et al in their study published in JAMA examined claims data from 14 commercial health care plans covering 7.4% of US adult women in 2013.   

They classified patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation (WBI) from 2008 and 2013 into 2 cohorts: (1) the hypofractionation-endorsed cohort (n=8924) that included patients aged 50 years or older without prior chemotherapy or axillary lymph node involvement and (2) the hypofractionation-permitted cohort (n=6719) included patients younger than 50 years or those with prior chemotherapy or axillary lymph node involvement. Hypofractionated WBI (3-5 weeks of treatment) vs. conventional WBI (5-7 weeks of treatment).

Hypofractionated WBI increased from 10.6 in 2008 to 34.5% in 2013 in the hypofractionation-endorsed cohort and from 8.1% in 2008 to 21.2% in 2013 in the hypofractionation-permitted cohort. Adjusted mean total health care expenditures in the 1-year after diagnosis were $28747 for hypofractionated and $31641 for conventional WBI in the hypofractionation-endorsed cohort (difference, $2894; $1610-$4234; P<.001) and $64273 for hypofractionated and $72860 for conventional WBI in the hypofractionation-permitted cohort (difference, $8587; $5316-$12017; P<.001). Adjusted mean total 1-year patient out-of-pocket expenses were not significantly different between hypofractionated vs. conventional WBI in either cohort.


They concluded that in spite the limitations of their study that they innumerate and discuss, hypofractionated WBI which is comparable in clinical efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity after breast conserving surgery increased among women with early-stage breast cancer in 14 US commercial health care plans between 2008 and 2013. However, only 34.5% of patients with hypofractionation-endorsed and 21.2% with hypofractionation-permitted early-stage breast cancer received hypofractionated WBI in 2013.  Mean total health care expenditures for patients receiving hypofractionated WBI were about 10% less than for patients receiving conventional WBI.