Showing posts with label Recall rate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Recall rate. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 1, 2014

Tomosynthesis detects more breast cancers

Friedewald at al report in a JAMA article a retrospective analysis of performance metrics of Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography from 13 academic and nonacademic breast centers.  
Patients were studied under two different protocols: those who had digital mammography screening alone and those who in addition to digital mammography, tomosynthesis was added .
A total of 454850 examinations (n=281187 digital mammography; n=173663 digital mammography + tomosynthesis) were evaluated. With digital mammography, 29726 patients were recalled and 5056 biopsies resulted in cancer diagnosis in 1207 patients (n=815 invasive; n=392 in situ). With digital mammography + tomosynthesis, 15541 patients were recalled and 3285 biopsies resulted in cancer diagnosis in 950 patients (n=707 invasive; n=243 in situ). Model-adjusted rates per 1000 screens were as follows: for recall rate, 107 (95% CI, 89-124) with digital mammography vs 91 (95% CI, 73-108) with digital mammography + tomosynthesis; difference, –16 (95% CI, –18 to –14; P<.001); for biopsies, 18.1 (95% CI, 15.4-20.8) with digital mammography vs 19.3 (95% CI, 16.6-22.1) with digital mammography + tomosynthesis; difference, 1.3 (95% CI, 0.4-2.1; P=.004); for cancer detection, 4.2 (95% CI, 3.8-4.7) with digital mammography vs 5.4 (95% CI, 4.9-6.0) with digital mammography + tomosynthesis; difference, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.8-1.6; P<.001); and for invasive cancer detection, 2.9 (95% CI, 2.5-3.2) with digital mammography vs 4.1 (95% CI, 3.7-4.5) with digital mammography + tomosynthesis; difference, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.8-1.6; P<.001). The in situ cancer detection rate was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.6) per 1000 screens with both methods. Adding tomosynthesis was associated with an increase in the positive predictive value for recall from 4.3% to 6.4% (difference, 2.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-2.5%; P<.001) and for biopsy from 24.2% to 29.2% (difference, 5.0%; 95% CI, 3.0%-7.0%; P<.001).

The authors conclude the addition of tomosynthesis to digital mammography was associated with a decrease in recall rate and an increase in cancer detection rate.


An editorial by Drs. Pisano and Yaffe on Tomosynthesis appears in the same issue of JAMA.