Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

Saturday, January 1, 2022

Covid-19 Pandemic; four countries - four tales

United States

A country of 330 million reports nearly 55 million cases during the last two years and 825,000 deaths or 2485 deaths per million due to Covid-19.  Sixty two percent of its population has been completely vaccinated and 21% has received a 3rd dose.  Although the U.S. is the leader in the development of vaccines their acceptance by the population has been mixed mostly due to political and cultural reasons.  In the past week the average daily cases per 100,000 people was 116 with the 14-day trend increasing.

Greece

A country of 10 million reports 1.1 million cases and 21,800 deaths or 2080 deaths per million.  The country had very few cases and deaths in the first wave of the pandemic.  This success story was due to a very strict lockdown.  Its vaccination program with 65% of its population completely vaccinated and 30% having had their 3rd dose is above average in Europe.  In the past week the average daily cases per 100,000 people was 195 with the 14-day trend increasing.

Taiwan

A country of 23 million instituted very good epidemiological measures since the beginning of the pandemic and reports only 17,000 cases that caused 848 deaths or 37 deaths per million.  In Taiwan 68% of its people are completely vaccinated and 1% had the 3rd dose.  The average daily cases per 100,000 people of the past week was 0.1 case with the 14-day trend increasing. 

New Zealand

A country of 5 million had 13,000 cases and 44 deaths or 9 deaths per million.  New Zealand enacted a very strong lockdown early in the pandemic and recently enacted a successful vaccination campaign with 78% of its people being fully vaccinated and with 7% having the 3rd dose.  The average daily cases per 100,000 people in past week was 1.2 with the 14-day trend increasing.

Discussion

Since Covid-19 was first diagnosed in China approximately 2 years ago it has infected 290 million people worldwide and has caused 5.5 million deaths according to JHU.  A total of nearly 9 billion doses of vaccines have been administered worldwide.  Although we now know that vaccines are not totally effective in the prevention of the disease, vaccinated individuals are not as sick as the non-vaccinated ones and definitely save lives especially among elderly individuals.  According to a recent study by WHO/ECDC nearly half a million lives have been saved in Europe alone in less than a year.  

The country with the worst death toll is Peru with 6,000 deaths per million and the country that has fared the best is China with 3 deaths per million.  The average daily cases in China per 100,000 people in past week was zero.

On Jan 1, 2021 the daily count of cases worldwide was 580,000 while on the first day of 2022 the number has surpassed the 1 million due to the latest mutation of the virus "omicron" which very transmissible.

In the last two years we learned that lockdowns work but they adversely economies therefore cannot continue for a long time.  Social isolation is also effective but it affects adversely people's psychology.  In spite of the worldwide upheaval the pandemic caused there were success stories such as the speedy development of vaccines.  The development of mRNA vaccines especially is noteworthy as they will likely be used not only in the prevention of viral diseases but the treatment of other diseases such as cancer. Also several antiviral medications have been developed and approved for use in the treatment of patients with Covid.

Conclusion   

The above mentioned advancements will be used in the prevention and control of diseases and will benefit the health of humans for many decades into the future. In closing, I will make a prediction from lessons learned from prior pandemics which usually last 3 years; thus 2022 will be the last year that Covid-19 will be classified as a pandemic becoming from an endemic disease instead one of several viral disease that afflict humans.

Saturday, January 2, 2021

The Corona Virus Epoch; A Review

We just finished one of the most turbulent years of our lives, which will be remembered as the Coronavirus epoch.  We now know that nearly 84 million people in 191 countries were infected by Coronavirus in 2020.  Those infections lead to approximately 1,8 million deaths.

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the coronavirus outbreak a pandemic.  Soon after the WHO declared a pandemic, two prestigious institutions made predictions regarding the potential death toll different countries might experience; the Institute of Health and Evaluation ( IHME) predicted that there would be 84,000 deaths in the United States by August of 2020, while the Imperial College of London predicted 1,2 million individuals will die in the US.  Both predictions were wrong as it is difficult for mathematical models to predict the severity of a pandemic and its resultant death rate.  It is near impossible to foretell how inhabitants of different countries will adhere to preventative measures recommended by health authorities.

On December 31, 2020, the United States reported 20 million confirmed cases of Covid-19, which caused 347,000 deaths.  In the same period, there were 14 million confirmed cases and 337,000 deaths in the 27 countries forming the European Union.  An endless stream of publications both in the scientific journals and lay press have addressed the disease and how different governments responded to the challenge of one in a lifetime pandemic.  

I have been following the pandemic since it was first announced by the officials in Wuhan city, in China's Hubei province.  Therefore, I am writing this post to highlight certain aspects of the pandemic, as well as lessons learned in the past twelve months. 

Upon reviewing the impact of the pandemic in different countries, I observed that the lay press primarily focused on the number of cases and the number of deaths reported by countries around the world.  Although they are important metrics, it does not tell the whole story.  Statistics such as the number of dead per million accurately assess the severity of the disease and how the health systems of different countries dealt with the epidemic.  Although the United States leads the world in confirmed cases, several European countries record higher deaths per million than the United States (1,051).  These countries include Belgium (1,693), Italy (1,244), Spain (1,086), and the United Kingdom (1108).  Others such as France (967), Sweden ((873), Netherlands (664), Greece (465), and Germany (408) had lower death rates.  It is now understood that the high death rates in Italy (1,244) and the State of New York (1,899) were not necessarily a result of inferior health systems, but more so from overwhelming caseloads exceeding intensive care units (ICU) capacity during the first wave of the pandemic.

Although some European countries such as Germany and Greece fared relatively well, several Asian countries have proven more successful in mitigating the impact of Covid-19.  Japan had 28 deaths per million, South Korea reported 18 deaths per million, Singapore 5 deaths per million and China had 4 deaths per million.  Taiwan's 802 confirmed cases and only 7 deaths since the beginning of the pandemic corresponds to 0,3 deaths per million - a most impressive accomplishment.

Another key metric regarding how countries' health systems are coping with the pandemic is the 7-day moving average of cases and deaths per million.  In the last 7 days the deaths per million, for select countries were as follows; UK (91), Germany (80), Italy (80), US (56), Greece (50), France (40), Sweden (7), Japan (36), South Korea (4), Singapore (0), China (0), and Taiwan (0).

A brief discussion of different approaches taken by three countries in dealing with the pandemic will point to their successes and failures. 

Taiwan is an island nation of 24 million that sits just 70 miles from mainland China. It has extensive business and social contacts with Wuhan, the epicenter of the SARS-CoV-2 viral outbreak.  Therefore, it seemed inevitable that Taiwan would have been one of the severely impacted countries in the world.  So, how did Taiwan manage to have only 802 cases and only 7 deaths due to the disease?  On January 20, 2020, Taiwan activated its Central Epidemic Command Center(CECC), which rolled out several measures. First, it provided its citizens with three free masks.  Six days later, Taiwan banned travel to and from Wuhan.  A JAMA article by Wang et al explains how the CECC used big data analytics, new technology, and proactive testing to monitor and control the endemic.  More importantly, the CECC served as the central source of information to the public, with daily conferences that provided reliable and easily understood information about the outbreak.  Taiwan's impressive 0.3 deaths per million can be attributed to these measures, and the Taiwanese population's rapid adoption of simple preventive measures including masks, social distancing, and hand washing.  Interestingly, Taiwan's Infection fatality rate (IFR) of the last 7 and/or 14 days remains 0 percent, as the last patient died on May 11, 2020.

Sweden, a northern European nation of 10 million people, instituted a controversial plan, reliant upon social distancing.  Sweden allowed people to move freely - visiting restaurants, bars, and stores  - without wearing masks if they kept distant from each other.  Although not everyone in Sweden was happy with this approach, most Swedes were satisfied.  Dr. Anders Tegnell, the epidemiologist, who advocated this approach believed that enough people will become immune by June of 2020,  which would have given Sweden an advantage as most countries would have experienced a "second wave" later in the year - something that indeed happened.  He also suggested that "lockdown" strategies have no scientific basis,  especially when it comes to young adults and children as they do not transmit the disease.  Sweden experienced a second wave, but its IFR of the last 7 days is 1.1% - among the lowest in Europe.

Greece, a southern European nation of 10 million, instituted two strict "lockdowns" as the method to control the spread of the pandemic.  The first lockdown started on February 27 and the second on November 7, 2020.  During the 2 1/2 months lockdown protocol, everyone in the country had to request permission to venture outside of their houses.  Permission was granted for visiting a supermarket, a pharmacy, a doctor; or for taking a brief walk outdoors.  Approval was granted by sending and receiving an SMS from a government agency.  Those caught violating the lockdown were fined 300 euros.  In addition, a total curfew was enacted between 9 pm and 6 am.  It was due to the timely lockdowns, Greece experienced one of the lowest death rates (488) in Europe. Greece's IFR of the last 7 days of 8% suggests that its health system has been overwhelmed by the second wave of Covid-19 cases, similar to what happened in  Italy and New York during the first wave of the pandemic.

A major development in the fight against Covid-19 was the development of two mRNA vaccines by Pfizer and ModernaThe vaccines which do not contain the live virus received emergency approval by the CDC in the United States and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in the European Union.  Since the vaccines were approved approximately 5 million people have been vaccinated in the United States.  Although this represents 1.5% of the total population, States have prioritized the vaccination of health care workers, nursing and assisted living homes' residents, individuals over the age of 75, and individuals with underlying conditions that put them at high risk of complications and/or death from the disease.  An encouraging development is the successful conclusion of the phase III trial of the Oxford vaccine and its subsequent approval by the UK Medicines and Health Products Regulatory AgencyAstraZeneca, the company that manufactures and distributes the vaccine, has initiated production and vaccinations have started in the United Kingdom.  It is expected that the Oxford vaccine, which can be stored at temperatures found in regular refrigerators, therefore it is easier to distribute, will soon be approved by the CDC in the US and by the EMA in the European Union.   

Two interesting but controversial approaches may be tried in the UK, in the near future.  The UK is currently experiencing an increase in the number of new cases and an increase in its IFR.  The first suggestion/plan is to give one dose of the vaccine(s) instead of two, as one dose is 70-80% effective.  If such a policy is employed, then twice as many individuals can be vaccinated in the next few months.  Therefore, the "herd immunity" threshold of 70% of the population could be reached earlier.  The second approach under consideration by the UK is to give the second or booster dose of a vaccine from a different company if the vaccines of the first company have been exhausted.  In the US, the Federal Government is in talks with Moderna regarding evidence from the phase II trial that two 50 microgram doses of its vaccine in individuals between the ages of 18 and 55, provides "identical immune response" to the recommended two 100 microgram doses.  Finally, in France, they decided to vaccinate all individuals over the age of 75 instead of staggering by decades such as 85 and over, 75 to 85, etc as most countries do.

It should be noted that Russia was the first country that started vaccinating its citizens with the Sputnik V vaccine, which was developed by the Gamaleya National Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology. Two hundred thousand Russians have been vaccinated as of December 14, 2020.  Israel has become the world leader in the fight against Covid-19 by procuring enough doses of Pfizer's vaccine and by vaccinating 10% of its population thus far, a true success story.  At least 150 companies around the world are developing vaccines.   Sinopharm and Sinovac in China have completed their phase III trials, and vaccination of China's 1.3 billion population has begun.  China plans to vaccinate 50 million of its citizens by mid-February.  The development of Covid-19 vaccines is a wonder of science, but the vaccines will not make Covid-19 disappear, thus people should continue preventive practices.

As of the end of 2020, the death of 346,000 individuals in the United States corresponds to a death rate of 0.1%, which is 5 to 10 times higher than the death rate from the seasonal flu.  If the vaccines prove to be 80-90% effective, as it was found on the completion of clinical trials, then the future death rate(s) experienced by the US and other countries will be similar to that of seasonal flu - provided that their population gets vaccinated.  I know this is a daring prediction, but I feel confident, that it will be the case.

In conclusion, while most people will like the complete eradication of the SARS-Cov-2 virus, it simply will not happen.  Viruses and bacteria are integral members of Earth's ecosystem and it is a hybris to advocate for their destruction.  A more reasonable approach for humans is to learn to co-exist with them and manage the deleterious effects with preventive measures.  So far, the Taiwanese have done so most successfully, and the Swedes to a lesser degree.   Wearing masks in enclosed spaces such as buses, keep social distance within reason, and employing hygienic practices such as regular hand washing, should be accepted and practiced by all.  Limited lockdowns should be utilized as measures of last resort, as it is well known that they have an adverse economic impact.  Finally, I expect the vaccine availability and usage to increase in 2021, and that medications such as dexamethasone, monoclonal antibodies, vitamin D3 will make the disease easier to control, allowing societies to return to normalcy, as we knew it.

 

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Boogie Woogie


Jeanette Smith describes the painting Boogie Woogie by Paul Chidlaw (1900-1989), a native of Ohio, in Art of JAMA

Chidlaw attended the Art Academy of Cincinnati from 1919 to 1923 and in 1927 moved to Paris, which at that time was the epicenter of experimentation in modern art.

He returned to the United States in 1935, and initially painted murals for the Works Progress Administration.  

In Boogie Woogie, a cheerful inundation of colors reminds the exuberance of the genre that became popular in the late 1920 and visually suggests a torrent of bright streamers and confetti drifting down from the winter sky at New Year’s celebrations. Although each and every color is stimulating in itself, the work in aggregate is even more motivating because of the effect of the contrasting hues and shapes.


Although Chidlaw’s eyesight was diminishing in his late years, he retained his creativity and spirit of artistic adventure and created paintings with colors combining as in a joyful symphony.

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Benefits, Harms, and Costs of Screening with Digital Mammography

Stout et al in their article published by the JNCI, report on the economic impact digital mammography had as it has replaced film in the United States.

Their research compared digital screening strategies starting at age 40 or 50 years applied annually, biennially, or based on density with biennial film screening from ages 50 to 74 years and with no screening. Common data elements included cancer incidence and test performance, both modified by breast density. Lifetime outcomes included mortality, quality-adjusted life-years, and screening and treatment costs.

For every 1000 women screened biennially from age 50 to 74 years, switching to digital from film yielded a median improvement of 2 life-years, 0.27 additional deaths averted, 220 additional false-positive results, and $0.35 million more in costs. For an individual woman, this translates to a health gain of 0.73 days. Extending biennial digital screening to women ages 40 to 49 years was cost-effective, although results were sensitive to quality-of-life decrements related to screening and false positives. Targeting annual screening by density yielded similar outcomes to targeting by age. Annual screening approaches could increase costs to $5.26 million per 1000 women, in part because of higher numbers of screens and false positives, and were not efficient or cost-effective.


They concluded that transition to digital breast screening in the United States increased total costs for a small added health benefit.  While the value of digital mammography screening for breast cancer among women aged 40 to 49 years was cost effective the women should be cognizant of the high rate of false positives.