Bhatt et al published in the NEJM the
findings of multicenter prospective trial of patients with severe resistant
hypertension who were randomly assigned to undergo
renal denervation or a sham procedure.
Before randomization, patients were
receiving a stable antihypertensive regimen involving maximally tolerated doses
of at least three drugs, including a diuretic. The primary efficacy end point
was the change in office systolic blood pressure at 6 months; a secondary
efficacy end point was the change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood
pressure.
A total of 535 patients underwent
randomization. The mean (±SD) change in systolic blood pressure at 6 months was
−14.13±23.93 mm Hg in the denervation group as compared with −11.74±25.94 mm Hg
in the sham-procedure group for a difference of −2.39 mm Hg. The change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic
blood pressure was −6.75±15.11 mm Hg in the denervation group and −4.79±17.25
mm Hg in the sham-procedure group, for a difference of −1.96 mm Hg.
The results of this landmark study that was designed to reduce clinical bias negate findings from prior reports that did not include sham treatment and reported that catheter renal artery denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. The study reminds us of the importance of conducting blinded trials with sham controls before new treatments or devices are adopted.
Bhatt DL, Kandzari,DE, O'Neill WW et al: A Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for
Resistant Hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 29. [Epub ahead of print]
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1402670?query=featured_home#t=article
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1402670?query=featured_home#t=article
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402670
No comments:
Post a Comment