Chiarelli et al in their JCO article report on Ontario’s Breast Screening Program
of women age 30 to 69 years at high risk for breast cancer with annual magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) and digital mammography.
The
study cohort consisted of 2,359 women. The following criteria were used to
determine eligibility: known BRCA1, BRCA2 mutation, or other gene predisposing
to a markedly increased risk of breast cancer, untested first-degree relative
of a gene mutation carrier, family history consistent with hereditary breast
cancer syndrome and estimated personal lifetime breast cancer risk of 25% or higher,
or radiation therapy to the chest before age 30 years.
Digital
mammograms were performed with standard craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections.
The minimum MRI standards were 1.5 Tesla
units, gadolinium injection (0.1 to 0.2 mmol/kg) and a dedicated breast coil. Both
breasts were imaged in axial and sagittal planes. Most of the eligible women (90.7%) had their
MRI within a month from their mammograms. Of the 2,359 eligible women 2,290 were
screened. Of the women screened 2,157
had an MRI and were included in the study as women who had only a mammogram
were excluded.
The recall
rate of 15% was significantly higher among women who had abnormal MRI alone
compared with 6.4% when mammogram alone was used. Of the 35 breast cancers detected (16.3 per
1,000), none were detected by mammography alone, while 23 (65.7%) were detected
by MRI alone (10.7 per 1,000), and 25 (71%) were detected among women who were
known gene mutation carriers (30.8 per 1,000). The positive predictive value of
12.4% for detection was highest when findings from mammogram and MRI were
combined. Overall, the cancer detection
rate was significantly higher for invasive cancers (12.6 per 1,000) compared
with DCIS (3.7 per 1,000). Cancer detection rates were higher among women age 50
years (23.3 per 1,000) compared with women younger than age 50 years (13.3 per
1,000) and significantly higher among those who were known gene mutation
carriers (30.8 per 1,000) compared with those with a family history plus an
estimated lifetime cancer risk of 25% (6.9 per 1,000).
An editorial by Dr. Wendie Berg with comments on this topic was published by the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
No comments:
Post a Comment